PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · Governor

REZA SAFARNEJAD

Governor · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
REZA SAFARNEJAD · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $1,786
Funding mix · 8 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $765 · 43%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $1,021 · 57%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $0 · 0%
Where the money comes from
6% from named interests
What this means →
Sort by
InterestAmountShareGiftsDonors
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable$2K94%77
Healthcare / pharma / medical$1006%11

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.

Top donors to primary committee (8)
01 Safar, Siamak · Retired $521
02 Navid, MohammadReza · MohammadReza Navid $500
03 Firoozfar, Mark · Retired $261
04 Kia, Omid · Omidkia LLC $104
05 Azarm, Reza · Armedia LLC $100
06 Parsee, Kian · Retired $100
07 Taheri, Bruce · DBA: Bruce Taheri $100
08 Malekuti, Sina · Retired $100
Primary committee total $1,786
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for Governor in this cycle (e.g. "REZA SAFARNEJAD for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee REZA SAFARNEJAD controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.