Electoral receipt · State Senate
JUAN CAMACHO
State Senate · SEN-26 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
JUAN CAMACHO · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 361 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $46,085 · 15%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $44,109 · 14%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $224,040 · 71%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 BG Law, LLP $11,800
02 Fox Corporation $11,800
03 LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual & Transgender) Caucus Leadership Fund $11,800
04 Dressler, Scott · Brutzkus Gubner Rozansky Seror Weber, LLP $6,000
05 Re-Elect Rick Chavez Zbur for Assembly 2026 $5,900
06 Building Bridges PAC $5,900
07 Camacho, Lizeth · n/a $5,900
08 Embry-Camacho, Karla · Cordoba Corporation $5,900
09 Equality California PAC $5,900
10 Farley, Adrian · Fox Corporation $5,900
11 Fiesta Taxi Co-Op, Inc. $5,900
12 Keller, Justin · Comprehensive Rehab Consultants $5,900
13 L.A. Taxi Cooperative, Inc. dba Yellow Cab $5,900
14 Marc Berman for Assembly 2026 $5,900
15 Mark Gonzalez for Assembly 2026 $5,900
16 SA Recycling $5,900
17 Freed, Jennifer · Trevanna Post, Inc. $5,100
18 DoorDash, Inc. $4,900
19 Global Paratransit, Inc. $4,000
20 Patrick Ahrens for Assembly 2026 $3,000
21 Tim Grayson for Senate 2024 $3,000
22 Honor PAC $3,000
23 OG Ventures, LLC $3,000
24 CalRetailers PAC $3,000
25 Rouse, William · William Rouse $2,750
Primary committee total $314,234
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "JUAN CAMACHO for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee JUAN CAMACHO controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.