PublicReceiptBeta
Electoral receipt · Governor

THUNDER PARLEY

Governor · 2026 cycle

Funding Receipt
THUNDER PARLEY · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Raised for this race $39,548
Funding mix · 5 unique donors · primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $2,417 · 6%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $581 · 1%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $36,550 · 92%
Where the money comes from
0% from named interests
What this means →
Sort by
InterestAmountShareGiftsDonors
Individuals (no industry data disclosed)unattributable$39K100%254
Other named interests
1 category below 1%: Healthcare / pharma / medical
$1000%11

Headline excludes self-funding and the unattributable individuals bucket — gifts from people for whom employer/occupation either isn't disclosed (Cal-Access leaves it blank on roughly 85% of individual contributions) or doesn't fit any sector category. Named interests below 1% of total raised collapse into a single "Other named interests" row to keep the long tail legible; the rolled-up category names are listed inline beneath that row. See the methodology for the classifier rules and the two distinct reasons a gift becomes unattributable.

Top donors to primary committee (5)
01 PARLEY, THUNDER · Thunder Parley $39,048
02 Parley, Gail · Not Employed $200
03 Sukhanov, Alex · Smartine Inc. $100
04 Parley, James · Coca-Cola $100
05 Stack, Alex · BioReset Medical $100
Primary committee total $39,548
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology

What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for Governor in this cycle (e.g. "THUNDER PARLEY for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee THUNDER PARLEY controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.