Electoral receipt · State Assembly
STEVEN HSIA
State Assembly · ASM-24 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
STEVEN HSIA · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 38 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $10,222 · 39%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $2,921 · 11%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $13,400 · 50%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Wen, Eric · Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory $5,900
02 Howell, James · A&J Programming $4,000
03 Chen, Pei Ju · Retired $2,500
04 Pefley, Carol · Realty World Dominion $1,400
05 Hsia, Max · King Cobb Corn $1,319
06 Alisantosa, Gwan · Supermicro $1,100
07 Booker, Martha · Retired $1,084
08 Chang, Sherry · Intel $1,000
09 Sit, Ross · Intero $966
10 Freimuth, Rita · TPMG $763
11 Kwei, Alice · Retired $634
12 Boucher, Greg · Metro Electric $584
13 Tran, Thao · Central Coast Construction $529
14 Hess, Judy · Judy Hess Landscape Design $500
15 Goedde, Carol · Retired $395
16 Willett, Patricia · Retired $320
17 Hobbs, Robert · Retired $313
18 Miller, David · Evergreen Venture Group, Inc $313
19 Nguyen, Susan · Davis Property Management $304
20 Zhu, Minxian · Retired $300
21 Oseberg, Lorrie · VikingSong Properties $261
22 O'Connor, Patrick · Retired $210
23 Wong, Maria · Retired $209
24 Chavez, Daniel · NorCal water heaters $170
25 Pelican, Mary · Retired $155
Primary committee total $26,544
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Assembly in this cycle (e.g. "STEVEN HSIA for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee STEVEN HSIA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.