Electoral receipt · State Senate
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA
State Senate · SEN-10 · 2026 cycle
Funding Receipt
SCOTT SAKAKIHARA · 2026 cycle
★ · campaign finance, itemized · ★
Funding mix · 145 unique donors ·
primary committee
S Small donors (Under $500) $18,248 · 12%
M Medium donors ($500–$999) $13,900 · 9%
L Large donors ($1,000+) $115,192 · 78%
Top donors to primary committee
(25 shown)
01 Sakakihara, Scott · City of Union City $48,992
02 Sakakihara, Melinda · New Haven Unified School District $11,800
03 Asian Pacific Islander Leadership PAC $5,900
04 Chee, Cyrus · Palantir Technologies $5,900
05 Sakakihara, Dean · n/a $5,900
06 Sakakihara, Tracie K. · n/a $5,900
07 Steamfitters Local 342 PAC $5,900
08 Sakakihara, Marvin D. · n/a $3,000
09 Japanese American Legacy PAC $2,500
10 Sprinkler Fitters & Apprentices Local 483 Statewide PAC $2,500
11 Bains, Harpeet · Department of Labor $1,600
12 Marquez, Elisa · Alameda County $1,500
13 Crawford, Renee · EOA Inc. $1,000
14 Foster, Dan · CAMCO $1,000
15 Garcia, Renee · City of Philadelphia $1,000
16 Harding, Gregory W. · n/a $1,000
17 Hironaka, Bruce · n/a $1,000
18 Ho, Kenneth · Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) $1,000
19 Lew, Ryan · Ernst & Young $1,000
20 Nishihira, Lance · Lance Nishihira $1,000
21 Perez, Lisa · Lisa Perez $1,000
22 Re-Elect Phong La County Assessor 2028 $1,000
23 Republic Services/LE03-Awin Management, Inc. $1,000
24 Sakakihara, Bruce · n/a $1,000
25 Tantoy, Christina · Arcadia Science $1,000
Primary committee total $147,340
Source: California Secretary of State Cal-Access bulk export
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
Pipeline: scripts/pull_calaccess_filings.py · Dedup: latest AMEND_ID
/methodology
What you're seeing. The Raised for this race total counts only money that flowed into committees clearly named for State Senate in this cycle (e.g. "SCOTT SAKAKIHARA for Assembly 2026"). The wider footprint shows every committee SCOTT SAKAKIHARA controls during the same window — ballot-measure leadership PACs, future-office exploratory committees, officeholder accounts. A candidate raising large sums into non-electoral vehicles still shows where the institutional attention is. Both surfaces are honest; they answer different questions.